22 September 2025

September News & Work In Progress 'Opening Lines'


Weekend Wandering
20th September
with Alison Morton and Julia Prima


15th - 19th September
full details
Jan Christopher Blog Tour

by Helen Hollick

my on-line diary


 September Thoughts from a Devonshire Farmhouse

Next Chapter Opening Lines
Work In Progress
(final content might change)

From 'Jamaica Gold'
the 7th Sea Witch Voyage

Previously
February 1718 - Nassau, The Bahamas
“Hello, sailor.” The red-headed young woman, her feminine assets bulging over the edge of her tight bodice, her fists set against broad hips protruding beneath a slim waistline, sashayed up to the table and seated herself on the wooden bench which ran along the back wall of the Crowing Cock tavern. 
Chapter 1
The Present – January 1720
Falmouth, Cornwall
The single, stray tear meandering down his cheek, Jesamiah Acorne convinced himself, was from the cold sea wind buffeting at his face with the viciousness of a needle’s vindictive prick. 

Chapter 2
Appledore, Devon
Fists on hips, her expression like God’s anger against Adam and Eve, Tiola glowered at her brother. 
Chapter 3
The Bahamas – February 25th 1720
With evening not far over the horizon, four or so hours sail out from Nassau, young Jasper Hicks’ voice floated down from where he was perched high on the cross-trees. “Deck there. Two sails, starb’d of us. Not sure who they are.”

Chapter 4
February 26th 1720
A few miles out from New Providence Island, dawn was tumbling into morning, dark blue brightening to a sapphire hue, the storm that had blustered across the ocean for a good part of the night had blown itself out. 
Chapter 5
“That one near the middle is the San Cristoforo, Cornejo’s flagship,” Jennings announced, peering through his telescope, some short while later. The small armada fleet could be clearly seen in formation as a blockade – as Jasper had predicted – to seal Hog Island and the entrance to Nassau harbour. 

to continue...



20 September 2025

WEEKEND WANDERING with ALISON MORTON and her Roma Nova Series...


Q & A with Alison Morton...

Let’s start with the burning question… You’re known as a writer of alternative history thrillers featuring your modern Praetorian heroines, Carina and Aurelia. What made you go back to the 4th century to write about the founders of Roma Nova?

JULIA PRIMA was inspired by my readers. They wanted to know how and why the 21st century Roma Nova was established back in the 4th century. Most of all, they were more than curious about the people who had stood up for their values in the face of lethal threats and eventually torn themselves away from everything they knew.

Like any country Roma Nova has its own history. In our real timeline, who today doesn’t have an older relative who remembers ‘the war’? We know exactly which war they are talking about because it was such a formative experience for that generation and the following one. At school, we learn about 1066, American Independence in 1776, the Battle of Waterloo, events long in our past but which have an impact on our countries today. To give Roma Nova a depth and some collective memory, I invented a history for it with roots in real events in the 4th century.

In the rest of the Roma Nova series, even in the first hundred pages of INCEPTIO, the first Roma Nova thriller, the modern day characters often refer to Julia Bacausa and Lucius Apulius – their legendary ancestors – so when readers said they were thirsty for more, I knew I had to tell their story.

Lucius and Julia

Tell us about these ancestors?

Julia Bacausa, just twenty, is the passionate and independent (translation: headstrong) daughter of the pagan Celtic ruler of the Virunum region in the Roman province of Noricum (approximately present day Austria). She’s miserable and tense after a failed marriage and although legally divorced under Roman law, there is no religious annulment possible from her Christian ex-husband, the local bishop’s nephew. Her father is wary of the growing political power exerted by the new religion. If she re-marries now in Virunum, it would cause a social and political uproar. She can see no future life for herself, let alone any hope of love.

Lucius Apulius is in his mid-twenties, the son of a long-established senatorial family, but that’s a problem in itself. Emperor Diocletian’s reforms in the late Roman Empire reinforced the promotion of equites (roughly the lower tier of aristocrats/upper middle class) who were increasingly professionalised and taking over the military and administrative roles of governing the empire. Diocletian excluded the senatorial class from all senior military commands and from all top administrative posts except in Italy as he considered them entitled and useless. However, while true in numerous cases, some senatorial sons like Lucius (and his friend Gaius Mitelus) are nevertheless keen to serve and are making a success of military careers.

In fact, Lucius is a rising star on Count Theodosius’s staff, taking part in restoring order after a rebellion in Britannia. As a reward, he’s been promised his own command in a big step for a young, ambitious tribune. It would have made his career despite his family background. But because he refuses to convert to Christianity, he’s thrown out and posted to a backwater in the mountains of Noricum. And he’s still very angry about it.


Writing two such uncompromising characters who are nevertheless sensitive human beings smarting from life’s unfairness is grist to the mill for any writer. In fact, part of the fun of writing is creating a raft of characters with vastly different personalities and watching them react with each other!

Noricum

How different is it from writing alternative history?

JULIA PRIMA is set in our historical timeline between AD 369 and 371 when the Roman world was riddled with religious strife and on the brink of transformation. That transformation hasn’t kicked off yet, but it’s hovering. No moment in history is fixed; it has its causes – direct and indirect – and its consequences – short term and long term. Behind the personal story of Julia and Lucius, this new book shows how the signs of decline are well and truly there and sets the scene for the start of the collapse (in the next book!)

Alternative history takes off from a point of departure (POD) triggered by an event, large or small. Writers should use the conditions prevailing at that point as the basis for developing their alternative timeline along historically logic lines. But essentially, you are writing in a void. With historical fiction, there are sources, both documentary and archaeological, sometimes sparse and often biased, but they are something available for reference and consultation, even though analysis of these sometimes causes strong arguments!

So, on the one hand, historical fiction writers have a skeleton, sometimes a whole body of research to mine for research. But opposite that, the good historical fiction writer is constrained by being obliged to search out and check with existing sources and in my opinion, not wander too far off verifiable facts. You can’t invent new Roman emperors, for example and retain credibility – we know who they all were!

Carsulae-Arch of Trajan

Did you encounter any special difficulties in your research?

Hahaha! Yes and no. No problem with the Roman side of things, but I did check on many individual things I thought I knew. Everything had moved on in the centuries since Augustus and Hadrian, from armour and military organisation to clothes and dining arrangements. But although I researched about trekking horses in the 4th century and knew about ‘no stirrups’, I was a little rocky on the practical aspects. So I consulted you! And I very much appreciated the input – thank you, Helen. Other ‘Romans’, such as Ruth Downie author of the Medicus series, helped on travel and Gordon Doherty sent me a wonderful reading list for the 4th century.

Can JULIA PRIMA be read as a standalone?

Although it’s the first of a new strand within the Roma Nova series called ‘The Foundation Stories’, as with all the series stories it can be read as a standalone. New readers might like it as a distant prequel to the whole series while current Roma Nova enthusiasts can add it as a backstory to the modern thrillers.


Buying links for JULIA PRIMA:

Ebook (multiple retailers):

https://books2read.com/JULIAPRIMA

Paperback

https://www.alison-morton.com/books-2/julia-prima/where-to-buy-julia-prima/

Separate ebook retailers if preferred:

Kindle: https://mybook.to/JULIAPRIMA   (Universal link)  

Amazon UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0B5LX41B7/

Kobo: https://www.kobo.com/ebook/julia-prima

Apple: https://books.apple.com/us/book/id6443066547

B&N Nook

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/julia-prima-alison-morton/1141719007?ean=2940186610922

 

About Alison

Alison Morton writes award-winning thrillers featuring tough but compassionate heroines. Her nine-book Roma Nova series is set in an imaginary European country where a remnant of the ancient Roman Empire has survived into the 21st century and is ruled by women who face conspiracy, revolution and heartache but with a sharp line in dialogue.

She blends her fascination for Ancient Rome with six years’ military service and a life of reading crime, historical and thriller fiction. On the way, she collected a BA in modern languages and an MA in history. 

Alison now lives in Poitou in France, the home of Mélisende, the heroine of her two contemporary thrillers, Double Identity and Double Pursuit. Oh, and she’s writing the next Roma Nova story.

Social media links

Connect with Alison on her Roma Nova site: https://alison-morton.com

Facebook author page:

https://www.facebook.com/AlisonMortonAuthor

Twitter: 

https://twitter.com/alison_morton     @alison_morton

Alison’s writing blog: 

https://alisonmortonauthor.com

Instagram: 

https://www.instagram.com/alisonmortonauthor/

Goodreads:  

Alison’s Amazon page: 

Newsletter sign-up: 

https://www.alison-morton.com/newsletter/

< Previous Weekend Wandering 

15 September 2025

I'm on Tour!

15-19 Sept
My Tour Of:


Rachel's Random Resources
Book Tours
15th September

@ukbook_reviewer

"super easy to read and enjoy.
If you like the idea of an old school mystery you’ll love this."


Pause the Frame

16th September


Really good Facebook review page

(Instagram)

17th September



18th September



Sarahd.loves.books
(Instagram)


19th September

"I loved this easy-to-read cozy mystery and have determined to read the 
five other books in this series."

Leanne bookstagram
(Instagram)


Nadine Sargent
(Instagram)






https://www.rachelsrandomresources.com/
@rararesources
#RachelsRandomResources

to Rachel and all the
wonderful hosts!

*** ***

scroll down to leave a comment

thank you!

13 September 2025

Weekend Wandering: Why did Harold of Wessex go to Normandy?

 a few thoughts by Helen Hollick

Recycled from an original post of 2010

In 1063/4 (possibly 1065 - we don't know the exact date, but I think pre-1065) Earl Harold of Wessex took ship from his family manor, Bosham, on the south coast of England and ended up in Normandy.

The recent awful TV drama (99% totally inaccurate and utter nonsense) King and Conqueror implied that Harold Godwineson and Duke William were best mates. They weren't. They didn't know each other personally until Harold's trip abroad. That did happen - it is clearly shown in the Bayeux Tapestry - what we don't know, is why Harold went to Normandy. 

Logically, it doesn't take much working out...

Harold and some of his men had planned the voyage, first praying (presumably for a safe journey) at the family church in Bosham, (say it as 'Bozzum') then after a jolly feast, loading a ship with various gifts...

Harold and his brother entering the church
(public domain)

The second scene clearly shows the men wading through shallow water to the boat - this is a very accurate depiction of Bosham as the tide comes in quickly and high, most of the sea-front houses, even today, have exactly the same sort of steps:

my friend James and some Bosham steps

For some reason Harold ended up on the other side of the Channel as a prisoner of Guy de Ponthieu. Harold and his men were experienced sailors, but did they meet a storm, get blown off course? Whatever happened, Duke William came to his rescue and apologised profusely to Harold for the misunderstanding. This was political diplomacy, Harold was King Edward's leading Earl - his second in command, and to be treated poorly would have been extremely embarrassing for William. Nor, at this stage, would there have been any reason between these two men for hostilities. In fact, the opposite, Duke William would have been keenly interested in ensuring political 'friendship'. (Much the same is happening today with various political leaders and Donald Trump.)

Harold then spent several months in Normandy, even going on campaign with William. In my novel, I write that William offers one of his daughters in marriage to Harold. There is no evidence for this - but it is a logical step. William would be wanting a sure, cemented alliance with England. Harold only had a 'common-law' wife (Edyth Swanneck) no official 'chuch' wife. A marriage would have made total sense.

But why was Harold there in the first place?

The answer is obvious. Since the early 1050s William had held two of Harold's family as hostage after a rather unpleasant incident between th Godwine family and some Normans at Dover. The hostages were Harold's youngest brother, Waltheof and his nephew, Hakon. Doesn't it seem likely that after these passed years, Harold was attenmpting to secure their release?

But after going on campaign, being (apparently) made welcome as a potential friend and maybe son-in-law), Harold was forced - tricked - into swearing an oath of fealty. To swear that he would support William's claim to the English throne. A claim William made through his relationship to Edward - Emma,Edward'smother wads William's Great-Aunt, plus William claimed that Edward had promised him the throne back in 1052 (jst before the Dover incident.) 

If Edward had done that it would have been overturned by English law, as the next Kinbg was elected by the Witan (the Council) the offer of inheritance was not Edward's to make.

It had become obvious in Normandy, that Harold's position as 'guest' had changed to that of 'prisoner'. 

Swear, or lose your life. Swear or never see your freedom again.

And the clincher for Harold going to Normandy?

He came back to England with his nephew, Hakon (who subsequently died at Hastings) but Walthof never saw his freedom again.



Read a far more accurate version of the events that led to 1066 in my novel - and don't bother with the rubbish TV drama

Amazon Author Page: https://viewauthor.at/HelenHollick

< previous 'Weekend Wandering' 


LATEST

Starting Monday 15th

Jan Christopher Blog Tour

*

20th September 

Weekend Wandering
with Alison Morton and Julia Prima

8 September 2025

Latest News


LATEST

6th September 1066 article by Helen Hollick


Monthly ‘newsletter’: Thoughts from a Devonshire Farmhouse



15th - 19th September
Jan Christopher Blog Tour

20th September 

Weekend Wandering
with Alison Morton and Julia Prima

PREVIOUS

August 21st
I was a guest on Alison Morton's blog
(Isn't that a lovely smile!)

4 September 2025

Weekend Wandering: articles or bits and pieces of interest by various authors

Why did Harold II, King of England, stand the fyrd (the army) down in August 1066? by Helen Hollick



I've no idea how the recent TV drama King And Conqueror dealt with this subject as the entire thing was such inaccurate drivel I stopped watching it very early on to save me putting a brick through my TV screen... what follows IS speculation, but plausible, logical speculation. (Unlike K&C)

Why did Harold II, King of England, stand the fyrd (the army) down in August 1066? Thus allowing William to march into England unopposed in late September? It's a question often asked, with the conclusion that Harold grossly misjudged the situation (and therefore implying that  he made an error and was, therefore, to blame for the subsequent defeat.) Hindsight is a wonderful thing - Harold, as it happened, did make an error of judgement BUT I think he did so for a very good, valid, reason. His only mistake was underestimating William's obsessive determination.

When King Edward died in January 1066 Harold Godwinesson was crowned king - elected by the English Witan as the only man suitable for the job. (Anyone who disagrees: that's another debate, for another day!)

Harold was expecting William to come  - let's face it, he had his spies and word would have got back to him that Duke William of Normandy was building a fleet, assembling an army and was preparing to invade. All summer Harold had the men of the Southern Fyrd (Wessex, Kent, Hampshire etc) on stand-by along the south coast of England, keeping alert for any sails appearing on the horizon across the English Channel. But in August, Harold sent the men home.

Why?

The argument of 'it was harvest' is not acceptable. The women and children left at home were perfectly capable of getting the harvest in while the men-folk were away. Contrary to popular (Victorian) belief, war did not stop because of the harvest - to use that thinking, war should also stop in spring because of the sowing / lambing / calving; in autumn because of the autumn slaughter - which leaves winter when fighting was not a good idea because of the cold, wet, dark, mud, snow. Although fighting in winter did also occur.

Harold was not stupid. he was an extremely capable and experienced commander (which is why he was crowned King, of course).

The only logical reason 'why' would be because he was certain William would not be coming that year. 

I do not have evidence, just logic, intuition, and probing what was not said in various primary Norman sources. 

Dives Sur Mer, Normandy

William built his fleet at Dives sur Mer - we know he sailed earlier than September (end of July, early August?). The next we hear, he is at St Valery, a lot further up the coast, some of his ships are wrecked and several of his men have died. He then hushes this up and commandeers other ships to replace those that were lost. The Norman version is that while moving to St Valery he met a storm which destroyed his fleet.

So if it was just a storm why try to hide and cover up the facts?

Many of his men were Viking descended and fishermen, therefore, experienced sailors. They'd know full well the dangers of storms, and not be overly bothered by them - not enough for the need to hide the bad news of a couple of lost ships and a few men. 

Now, consider the fact that England had a powerful and effective navy and plenty of ships. You can see the fleet as 'ghost' ships in the border of the Bayeux Tapestry in the Westminster scene where Halley's Comet is depicted. Given the time of year, it is probable that this scene depicts the keels hauled up onto the land to overwinter; i.e. not made ready for sailing - an indication of the season and that Harold had not sent the fleet out yet. Or it could indicate the coming of William's fleet. Or the destruction of his fleet. Or anything else that we don't know about.

'ghost' ships in the bottom border

Given we had an effective and very efficient fleet - is it not absurd that Harold would not have ordered a blockade of the Channel? His predecessors - Aethelred, Cnut (and Edward) used blockade tactics very successfully. Harold's grandfather and father were heavily involved with the English Fleet (the scyp fyrd) Indeed the Godwinesson's main manor house was intended as a deterrent against any ship-borne invasion. Bosham is on the coast near Chichester, in Harold's time it was a busy harbour. Earl Godwine had the church tower specifically built as a watch tower for invading Vikings - not as a church tower. 

Bosham Church
and harbour

It is inconceivable that Harold had not used his knowledge of the sea and shipping and available forces to best advantage. It therefore does not take much logic to work out that William met the English Fleet head-on mid-channel and was turned back with heavy losses of men and ships. That fact, Duke William would want to keep quiet!

If Harold had already defeated William - does this not explain why he assumed his rival would not be coming that summer, and therefore stood his men down?


This was a mistake on Harold's part, an understandable one, although it later cost him his life. He underestimated William's determination. Maybe he received exaggerated information? Perhaps he was told that most of William's fleet had been destroyed, whereas maybe most of the ships were only damaged? Whatever the truth, all credit to Duke William for he re-rallied and tried again - unexpectedly - in September. 

I also wonder - just throwing this in here - as Harold assumed that William would not be coming until 1067, was this why he went north to Stamford Bridge to face his brother Tostig and the invading Hardrada and his men? It's just a thought: if Harold had suspected that William would try again so soon, would he have stayed in the south and sent his brothers north in his stead? As it was, he thought the South was safe.

The Normans made no mention of a first (failed) attack and defeat by a blockade of English ships but this does not indicate that it didn't happen. 

In fact, I think the 'no mention' proves the opposite!


And as final 'evidence', one of the first men Duke William had arrested and imprisoned was the Commander of the Fleet - Eadric the Steersman (who later fled to Scandinavian exile). I wonder why William was so cross with this guy?

e-book buy on Amazon

I included such a sea battle in my novel Harold The King (UK title) / I Am The Chosen King (US title)  and I altered the scene slightly for an alternative story to be included in an anthology of 1066 stories by various authors 1066 Turned Upside Down. Except of course, as far as I'm concerned this story is not an 'alternative' but a 'strong possibility!'

buy on Amazon.co.uk

buy on Amazon.com

note: publisher info is out of date

Next 'Weekend Wandering' Post > (coming soon)


Feel free to leave a comment below
or